When it comes to comparing different SARMs, I keep seeing people talk about how some of the newer options might actually work better in terms of strength, recovery, and overall results than the ones that have been around for years. Do you think the difference really comes down to things like potency, half-life, and how the compound distributes in the body, or is it more about how consistently someone trains and eats while using it?
top of page
bottom of page
Yeah, honestly, it’s kind of tricky to say which one’s better because a lot depends on your own body and how you train. People often compare ac-262 vs ostarine for stuff like strength, recovery, and how long it lasts in your system, and some notice bigger gains with one over the other. Still, it really comes down to doing things right with your workouts, nutrition, and cycle, instead of just chasing what sounds stronger.